Erich Schubert wrote:
> > And is totally unneeded for qmail-ldap as this feature is builtin.
>
> The builtin has some drawbacks, too.
> It has no RBL-Specific error message as rbmlsmtpd does, and does not give
> the user an url explaining why his mail was rejected.
> The error message should at least include http://mail-abuse.org/rbl/ as
> reference.
I have fixed that last week for upcoming qmail-ldap. It reports the
RBL that matched and displays a custom message you can define. You can
also toggle between rejecting the connection or putting a "X-RBL:"
header.
> > > Currently i get about 5 double bounces a week, but i have just about 600
> > > customers; these double bounces are usually some mails with a bad
> > > Return-Path sent to no longer existing addresses.
> >
> > So. we have more customers and i get less double bounces. This discussion
> > brings has no target.
>
> Which is mostly due to qmail-ldap rejecting disabled accounts upon recieving
Since when does it do this?
> the message; regular qmail did not have this feature but did accept them,
> try to bounce them, bounce fails and the postmaster get's the double bounce.
> > not significant compared to the total mail traffic. Processing power is no
> > issue on mail servers (at least as long as such crap as virii scanners arent
> > running).
>
> I was talking about traffic, but you're right: spam and bounces have no big
> attachments.
--
Andre
