On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:39:49AM -0400, Mike Cathey wrote: > To do what? not hardcode attribute names but using defines and some smaller mods I don't remember exactly. I had a longer discussion with the maintainer (hmm... was [EMAIL PROTECTED] or so), he wanted to include such a thing, I don't know if its in now. > >>are your quota specific proftpd patches available? what did you extend? > >> > > > > I didn't hack quotas in proFTPd, that,s included (though nearly > > undocumented). I hacked the LDAP module a bit. > > > -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Karl Pitrich
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Charlie ROOT
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? James Tavares
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Bjoern Metzdorf
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Mike Cathey
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? John Morrissey
