On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 09:55:30AM -0400, Charlie ROOT wrote: > Umm.. check out pure-ftpd. It has ldap support, It looks good at a first glance, but would need the same hacks I've made for proFTPd. A quota management is missing if I haven't overlooked it - with virtual-only users the OS quotas don't work... > and I don't know about > currently with the new maintainers for Pro, it had a lot of security > problems. The recent versions are looking good. Summary: FTP must die. -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Karl Pitrich
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Dan Melomedman
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Charlie ROOT
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? James Tavares
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Bjoern Metzdorf
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Mike Cathey
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Henning Brauer
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
- Re: qmail-ldap for high load instalations ? John Morrissey
