> NO NO NO. Use qmail-ldap-20010301, 05 is indeed a bit buggy. But don't use
> dash-trick 0501 with qmail-ldap 0301. use dash-trick 20010306 instead. 0501
> is for qmail-ldap 0501 and buggy, too.
I'm running 20010501 since mid-may.
The only problem i still do have (objectclass-bug etc. fixed) is with
TLS; i havn't tried the patches which came recently to this list yet.
So why is there so a lot of fuss about 20010501?
And why can't someone create a updated patch so this repetitive topic is
finally cut off? :-( Or at least remove it from webpages and put up a
sign "do not use 20010501"?
I'm even thinking about unsubscribing.
Courier "maild" came up in some mail - does someone have experiences
with this MTA? As i'm running courier-imap and courier-pop happily, and
afaik they do have native ldap support, don't they?
and they do have a licence you can use for developing...
hey, and courier support qmail-style virtual-domains ;)
Greetings,
Erich
