On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:37:05PM +0200, Erich Schubert wrote:
> > NO NO NO. Use qmail-ldap-20010301, 05 is indeed a bit buggy. But don't use
> > dash-trick 0501 with qmail-ldap 0301. use dash-trick 20010306 instead. 0501
> > is for qmail-ldap 0501 and buggy, too.
> I'm running 20010501 since mid-may.
> The only problem i still do have (objectclass-bug etc. fixed) is with
> TLS; i havn't tried the patches which came recently to this list yet.
The most bugs are no show-stoppers. 0301 is just better ;-))
> So why is there so a lot of fuss about 20010501?
> And why can't someone create a updated patch so this repetitive topic is
> finally cut off? :-(
I think I'm not the only one waiting impatient for 20010801. There will be
one, Andre/Claudio, nor...?
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
