Dan Melomedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:14:14PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:35:27AM -0600, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Dan Melomedman wrote:
> > >
> > > > I asked for this before, and will ask again: why not provide all patches
> > > > separately in addition for the unified patch for qmail-ldap?
> > > >
> > > What's stopping you?
> >
> > What;s stopping you from make a combined patch indluding whatever you want?
> > the qmail-ldap patch is BSD licensed, my patches are BSD licensed, and I'm
> > sure the other patches authors will happily clarify their licenses
>
> You do not understand. What I'd like to see is the ldap part of the
> patch separate from all other patches in the distribution. Currently the
> qmail-ldap patch is a unified patch that combines ldap and many other
> patches.
You should be able to apply the whole qmail-ldap patch, find out what
patches are included that you don't like, download those patches, and
back them out with the -R flag to patch.
It will be a pain to sort out what patch can't do automatically, of
course, but not impossible.
If you manage it, probably others would be interested in your work.
-----ScottG.
