On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 08:42:10PM -0400, Rafael Angarita wrote: > > > Are there any issues with using OpenLDAP 2 instead? > > I strongly recommend OpenLDAP 1.2.11 instead of 2.x. Last time I checked > > OpenLDAP 2.x was everything but stable under load. OpenLDAP 1.2.11 ist > > solid, at least under OpenBSD. > > Henning > > What's the max number of request you have made simultaneously from qmail > to your openldap server?
sorry, I don't have detailed statistics handy. > I'm having some problems to estimate the max number of file descriptors > allowed by process in qmail and openldap. > According to the load handled by my server I estimated 256 files > descriptors is ok to qmail (set executing ulimit -n 256) by I have no clue, > how much is right for openldap, it always hangs up (slapd is consuming up > 90% of cpu and the server stop answering queries to ldap)... Do you have > any suggestion? is this under linux? I remeber this. When I move OpenLDAP to a BSD machine nearly all problems went away. > Aditionally, my qmail version (with Andre Opperman's ldap patch) is a > little old, so I'm not sure if this could be "disturbing" the ldap server, > could it be? I don't think so, but you should realy upgrade to the upcoming patch. there were lots of (positive) changes. Greetz HEninng -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * BS Web Services, Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
