On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:59:41 +0300 "Taymour A. El Erian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I use stock qmail (which I did earlier), I loose a lot of features > (TLS/SSL smtpd logging, antispam etc..) and to have the back I need to eek! antispam easy, rbls/qmail-scanner, i couldnt undestand what exactly you mean with `logging` log in? or producing log files in general. i`m sure you`d be able to use smtp authentication without ldap? otherwise, what costs you to add two users in the ldap db(ldap is enuf light but is one service more.. :) > apply a bunch of patches which might conflict with each other. > > Reagrding SSL/TLS, it is customers' request to have such service. yeah client are always right;) cheers, -lk > > Lou Kamenov wrote: > > >On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:28:55 +0300 > >"Taymour A. El Erian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Hi, > >> I am installing qmail-ldap with the latest patch, I'll be using it > >>for an outgoing mail server only where there are no users in the ldap. > >>Is there anyway to disable its ldap lookup for users and only look > >>locally (for postmaster and the other aliases). > >>I am using it because it contains features that I need, like SSL/TLS. > >> > >> > > > >then use plain qmail, without ldap. sure qmail can run without ldap and with >ssl/tls. One more question why you want tls/ssl for 1/2 accounts only? (just curious) > > > >cheers, > >-lk > > > > > > > >>-- > >>Taymour A El Erian > >>System Division Manager > >>T.E. Data > >>E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Web: www.tedata.net > >>Tel: +(202)-7494025 > >>Ext: 1101 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > Taymour A El Erian > System Division Manager > T.E. Data > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web: www.tedata.net > Tel: +(202)-7494025 > Ext: 1101 > > > >
