On 22 Jun 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My initial email had a small PS attached to it to try to avoid > fruitless discussion about the patch on the list and being told that > "the work of porting the patch was not worth the effort" > Thank you no one told me that (yet) ;-)
Thomas, would you consider splitting your patch into a "spfchecker" program and a SENDERVERIFY environment variable as I suggested earlier? I think that would make your patch immensely useful and modular. Thanks Ted
