Well yes.. and it IS more secure IF you are able to enfore secure passwords.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:29:13 -0600, Omar Armas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El Mi� 09 Feb 2005 11:20, Matt escribi�: > > To respond to OMAR: > > I agree.. SMTP-AUTH is nice except for this reason: > > You have 60,000 users... you can't force them all to use secure > > passwords.. some of them use passwords like my 'mykitty' or 'blue'. > > If you enforce password policies like we do in the office (8 or > > more characters, at least 1 upper case, number and special character) > > you end up with people forgetting their passwords, and/or going > > elsewhere. > > I have about 20000 users with a few thousands domains , about 4000 users > migrated to qmail, all of them with smtp-auth+tls. > Is secure and users are adapting to it without problems, we tell them its the > new standar, is more secure and they accept it. > > Omar >
