qmail-scanner is slow. simple as. If you are saying that your qmail-ldap server is slow then you are doing something wrong. I use qscanq which is very quick.
On 5/23/07, sato x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi ... I read somewhere saying that simscan (written in C) was better than qmail-scanner (written in pearl). But according to my experience, it's not true (pardon my stupidity), because my qmail-ldap server, with simscan+clamav+spamassassin, is slower than the qmail server, with qmail-scanner+clamav+spamassassin. Slower means the time the server took to process incoming emails. Actually it really doesn't matter anymore since I had decided to scan emails come from other domain only. But I am just curious with the fact I notice above and I want to make sure that there's nothing wrong with my qmail-ldap configuration. Thanx before. sato
-- slr
