In my configuration my server is qmail-ldap I install simscan because faster and only scan virus for intermail mail and I install Smtp gateway with postfix+ spamassasin+amavisd+clamav for incoming mail from internet, and You can build Smtp gateway with qmail
Thanks _____ From: Scott Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 May 2007 16:57 To: sato x Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Which one is better: qmail-scanner or simscan? qmail-scanner is slow. simple as. If you are saying that your qmail-ldap server is slow then you are doing something wrong. I use qscanq which is very quick. On 5/23/07, sato x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi ... I read somewhere saying that simscan (written in C) was better than qmail-scanner (written in pearl). But according to my experience, it's not true (pardon my stupidity), because my qmail-ldap server, with simscan+clamav+spamassassin, is slower than the qmail server, with qmail-scanner+clamav+spamassassin. Slower means the time the server took to process incoming emails. Actually it really doesn't matter anymore since I had decided to scan emails come from other domain only. But I am just curious with the fact I notice above and I want to make sure that there's nothing wrong with my qmail-ldap configuration. Thanx before. sato -- slr
