2010.07.19 14:50 Jimmy Spam rašė: > > Tomas Kuliavas <to...@users.sourceforge.net> escribió: > >> Which program is used for antivirus/spam scanning in qmail setup? > > Kaspersky AntiSpam and Kaspersky AV for LinuxMailServer > > You probably are thinking that it's a stupid idea
No. I suspected that unoptimized antivirus setup might be slowing things down. My suspect was qmail-scanner and undaemonized clamav or spamassassin. I am not familiar with kaspersky queue performance. Used it once ages ago and then replaced with simscan or qmail-scanner. > This is my rbllist file: > > # baseaddress action matchon Message > #========================================================================== > # sbl.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.2 See > http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL > # bl.spamcop.net addheader 127.0.0.2 See http://spamcop.net/ > bl.spamcop.net reject 127.0.0.2 See http://spamcop.net/ > zen.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.2 See http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL > zen.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.3 See http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL > zen.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.10 See http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL > zen.spamhaus.org reject 127.0.0.11 See http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL CBL/XBL is deliberately excluded? IMHO it has higher hit rate in spamhaus RBL. Can you check how fast your spamhaus DNS lookups are and maybe consider running local RBL? Spamhaus offers 30 day trial, if you want to check how local RBL would affect your email performance. -- Tomas
