Quoting Peter Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I just setup Qmail-scanner + spamassassin yesterday.
> 
> If you have an entry like
> 63.172.73.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 
> Spamassassin will NOT scan that message, or messages from those ip
> addresses.
> 
> Header from yahoo.com (non relay client ip)
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by 11.goquest.net by uid 502 with
> qmail-scanner-1.12 (spamassassin: 2.30. . Clear:SA:1(1.6/1.0):. Processed
> in
> 0.345283 secs); 20 Jun 2002 16:22:20 -0000
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=1.6 required=1.0
> 
> Header from goquest.com (relay client ip)
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by 11.goquest.net by uid 502 with
> qmail-scanner-1.12 (spamassa
> ssin: 2.30. . Clear:. Processed in 0.055295 secs); 20 Jun 2002
> 16:28:53 -0000
> 
> Both of the messages had the exact same content.
> 
> Just to restate, if a message comes from a RELAYCLIENT it is never sent to
> the spamd daemon.
> 
> This about drove me crazy before I figured it out
> 
> Peter Maas
> pixl@!goquest.com
> 


I have the same problem. I have 2 Qmail processes running. The first excepts 
connections on port 25 on all interfaces and forwards them to port 26 on 
127.0.0.1.

I have 127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" in my smtp.rules file.

How do you get around spam assasin not testing the emails?

Maybe in my case I have two qmail-scanners running. The first on port 25 just 
does the spam stuff. The second does the virus checking on port 26?

Any ideas?

Dan




-------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to