Yes, qmail-scanner works on the queue itself; it does not care where the 
message eventually ends up.  I have a similar setup where there 
are two public MX servers that relay the mail to a final, 3rd 
server.

However, there is the issue that if both mail servers are qmail servers
with Q-S installed, the email will end up getting scanned twice before
being "delivered".  If that's the case, you may be interested in a patch I
posted a couple weeks ago called "trusted clustering".  The first server
scans the message normally, then tacks on an X-header specific to that
message and a shared key between the systems.  When the second server sees
that header, it trusts that the first server scanned the message, and
doesn't scan it a second time.

RF

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> hi all
> 
> i need to put qmail has a gateway it will be relaying email to another
> server:
> 
> qmaildmz(qmail-scaner here) ------> storgeserver
> 
> I want to know if qmail-scanner works in this case where there is no local
> delivery, and where qmail is just routing messages.
> 
> I also want to know if it is a way to limit the number of recipients, for
> example limit the number of recipients to 20 so that no one can send mail
> to more than 20 people at the same time.
> 
> 
> regards.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to