Hello!
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:29:03 -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, I understood that (I'm not an idiot, as you may be
>implying).
> BTW, please don't be so arrogant to ask others "Please read
>the post carefuly before replying" [sic]. You win nothing with this
>attitude.
Sorry.. I didn't want to imply that you are and idiot.
> What should be done when the sender wants his/her personal
>replies back to a different address *BUT* doesn't want to receive all
>replies to his/her post personally, that is, the poster still wants to
>keep the discussion on the list? Add another Reply-To field to the
>message?
I see that there is no point in continuing this debate, I apologize if
I insulted you; it was not my intention. But I do doubt it that it is
the *right* way to force everyone to use mutt. Some of us just don't
like it. :)
best regards,
Rok Papez,
Student at Faculty of Computer and Information Science,
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
