Text written by Russell Nelson at 03:18 PM 2/19/99 -0000:
>Rok Papez writes:
> > Who is talking about two "Reply-To:" fields ????
>
>Anybody who suggests that the Reply-To should be set to "the" list.
>What happens when mail is sent to multiple lists?  Each sets the
>Reply-To to its own list, and the discussion is immediately
>fragmented.  Doh!

Like it wouldn't be already? Or are you suggesting that the originator
would manage all the mail coming back to hir, acting as a temporary gateway
between the two lists?

Normally, discussions on two different lists probably *should* be
fragmented -- or at least, they normally will be. After all, they are two
_separate_ lists, right?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                             Kai MacTane
                         System Administrator
                      Online Partners.com, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
>From the Jargon File: (v4.0.0, 25 Jul 1996)

casting the runes /n./ 

What a guru does when you ask him or her to run a particular program
and type at it because it never works for anyone else; esp. used when
nobody can ever see what the guru is doing different from what J.
Random Luser does. Compare incantation, runes, examining the entrails.

Reply via email to