D. J. Bernstein writes: > I took 30 envelope sender domains from Bruce Guenter's 1999 spam archive > > The original 30 pieces of spam have been slashed to a mere 28. Amazing! Right. Same as last time, it succeeded in deleting about 10% of the spam. Are you saying that the cost of this is excessive? Maybe it's a choice you wouldn't make, but why do you deny that choice to others? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
- Re: Vendors and tied hands Edward S. Marshall
- rblsmtpd error codes D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... johnjohn
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... ddb
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Sam
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... ddb
- Example of the anti-fax effect D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Example of the anti-fax ef... Sam
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Russell Nelson
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Bart Blanquart
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification ... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein