On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 08:02:14PM -0000, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > anyone want to use a product that placed vendor convenience over > excellence? I run qmail in a non-standard location and it works just It is users' convenience. RedHat's packaging system will not be able to verify the qmail bianries if they get edited after installation. But if you write a patch to rpm for this, great. In the meantime we can use rpm to figure out why qmail slowed down after moving the queue to a different partition---a problem more common than security breaches. -- --- Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... ddb
- Example of the anti-fax effect D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Example of the anti-fax ef... Sam
- Re: Example of the anti-fax ef... Russell Nelson
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Scott Schwartz
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... Bart Blanquart
- Re: Why Red Hat is not distrib... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: System integrity verification ... Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Frivolous forking Russell Nelson
- Re: Frivolous forking Jos Backus
- RE: Frivolous forking Jan Mikkelsen
- Running the qmail system as root D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Running the qmail system as root Russell Nelson
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein