On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
> > as qmail-return-28866-somethi=lobodirect.com or something.
> Should be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no, not really. just like the /bin/sh script that was posted
before was actually a bash script (or something other
non-standard /bin/sh). When I say it was lobodirect,
I mean that. I'm subscribed to this list from there, not here
or scottyelich.com.
> > Just my guess. It wouldn't be the first time that qmail/ezmlm did
> > something that I couldn't figure out! :-/
> Have a look for VERP at Dans site.
I've been scouring the documentation since my rant earlier tonight that
was 8 hrs ago? It's now 2:30am. I'm also creating my own qmail page
just so I can save my friends from the insanity of the qmail docs. I
just found the
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/5799/qmail-uce.html page
and it looks really impressive.
I've been trying to find a consolidated documentation on all the
accustamp, cyclog, supervise, etc. I barely found a link to
daemontools!
I was at least able to solve the tcp-env /etc/hosts.allow RELAY client
issue to a tcpserver .cdb, without even a reference to it in any of the
docs. I've manage to dig up a message from feb 1 from the qmail list (I
saved it for future reference) to come back to when I was going to
address spam -- to allow me to use multiple rbl lookups with rblsmtpd
(although I didn't quite get why I have to run multiple rblsmtpds
instead of just passing multiple -r's to a single rblsmtpd).
There's just a lot of potholes in the documentation.
The qmail-uce stuff is awesome. I can't wait to fileter some mail that
way -- but the install assumes that I'm doing the qmail install from
scratch -- and I already have it installed. Unless I missed it, it
doesn't say whether or not the re-install over the current install won't
harm anything. I'm going to try to install the qmail-smtp (or is it
qmail-send?) manually. Wish me luck.
Scott
