Matthew Harrell writes:
> which results in a large number of messages in the queue. This has got to
> slow things down
It doesn't.
> This would also be nice for some error recovery if I decide to put the whole
> queue directory on a ramdisk. After all, if it crashes I've just lost all
> traceability on my mailing list.
That's why it's on the disk.
> Is the syslog-alternative program for qmail (I can't think of it's name right
> now) a great deal faster?
Yes. That's the first thing to replace when you've got a high load.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
