Jim Beam writes:
> Can anyone give me some solid - documented reasons why qMail would
> be a better solution for us? (We are looking at heavy modifications
> to either flavors, so that is not an issue - we are using a portal
> product that is totally SQL driven, and all daemons will have to
> authenticate from it - also, we will be using a hashed dir
> structure (5 layers deep) for the users Maildir(s)).
I think your parenthesized explanation is the best reason to go with
qmail. With qmail, no modifications are needed. You'll have to write
your own checkpassword, and qmail-getpw, but they are 132 lines and 88
lines respectively. Not exactly rocket science, even after you
include the code to query your SQL database.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
