(my last post in this thread...sorry for getting caught up in it) Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > True, but even factually-based prejudice, when based on _correlation_ > > rather than _causation_, is mighty risky business. > > I'm prejudiced against sendmail, and in favor of djb's software. I > don't view that as particularly risky. True, but you can make a decent case for "causation" here. Sendmail has a long and illustrious history of failure and security flaws. It would be wrong to call you "prejudiced" for judging it on its track record. Judging all mail from dialups, though, based on the "track record" of such mail, is the fallacy of reasoning from the general to the specific. Len. -- He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the LORD. --Proverbs 17:15
- Re: Three solutions for... l41484
- Re: Three solutions for... l41484
- Re: Three solutions for... ddb
- Re: Three solutions for... l41484
- Re: Three solutions for... ddb
- RE: Three solutions for... Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for... craig
- OT-Thug's life was(Re: ... mgibbins
- RE: Three solutions for... l41484
- RE: Three solutions for spam Russell Nelson
- Re: Three solutions for spam Len Budney
- Re: Three solutions for spa... Paul J. Schinder
- Re: Three solutions for spa... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Three solutions for spam Chris Johnson
- Re: Three solutions for spam Peter van Dijk
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Three solutions for spam Paul J. Schinder
- Re: Three solutions for spam Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Three solutions for spam ddb
- Re: Three solutions for spam Paul J. Schinder