On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 12:24:05PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > That server is violating RFC 1123, section 5.2.5. You can easily work > > around the problem by putting www.cheetahmail.com into control/helohost. > > > > (I'm considering changing the default HELO in qmail-remote in qmail 2.0 > > to use the bracketed IP address of the client.) > > How much of a standard is that? RFC821: HELO <SP> <domain> <CRLF> <domain> ::= <element> | <element> "." <domain> <element> ::= <name> | "#" <number> | "[" <dotnum> "]" <dotnum> ::= <snum> "." <snum> "." <snum> "." <snum> <snum> ::= one, two, or three digits representing a decimal integer value in the range 0 through 255 Therefore, HELO [199.103.176.41] looks like it is acceptable. -- System Administrator See complete headers for address, homepage and phone numbers
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instances o... Hitesh Patel
- RE: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instances o... Stefan Paletta
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instances o... Sam
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail instan... Andy Smith
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmail in... Sam
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent qmai... Russell Nelson
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent ... Kai MacTane
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diffrent ... David Villeger
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diff... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Anand Buddhdev
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Eric Shafto
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Anand Buddhdev
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Dave Sill
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 ... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Q: Is it possible to bind 2 diff... D. J. Bernstein