> From: "Fred Lindberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 09:05:36 -0500
> Reply-to: "Fred Lindberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Priority: Normal
> Subject: Re: QMAIL definitely violates PIPELINING specification ...
> What do you think of that ???
I think the "Red Hat Linux release 5.2 (Apollo) Kernel 2.0.36 on an
i686" and the "FortKnox Proxy Telnet (Version 4.0)", and the "FortKnox
Proxy Transparent FTP (Version 4.0)" and others are all messed up.
Try telnetting to mailhost.temex.fr, ports 21 and 25 using Windows'
telnet and you'll see why... :-)
> As I complained to sorena (the editor of ZMailer) of errors 500
> generated when there was a connection in between Qmail and Zmailer,
> here was their answer... Any idea ?
>
> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: QMAIL definitely violates PIPELINING specification ...
> >
> >yep, it is definite, QMAIL violates RFC 2197, and should *NOT*
> >claim support for PIPELINING.
> >
> >MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BODY=8BITMIME
> >RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >250 ok
> >250 ok
> >
> >After that "MAIL From:" command it reads successfully the "RCPT
> >To:", but it would loose any input (at least the "DATA") after
> >"RCPT To:" processing. /Matti Aarnio
Regards,
Andrzej Kukula
