I'm not sure I understand the "raison d'etre" of the new list. That is, how is the new 
list substantially different from this one?

Dave

On Wednesday, June 30, 1999 10:01 AM, Alex Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I pump all my qmail list mail files to a special folder and am adept at
> using find utilities to find if previous people have commented on the issue
> I am concerned with.
> 
> I have decided to start a new qmail mailing list using EZMLM.
> 
> Here are the rules.
> 
> Postings should be related to the following subject areas.
> 
> QMail
> QMail security
> QMail on a system that has a firewall
> Memphis RPM
> Summer RPM
> Tarball documentation
> UCSI tcp server
> TCP wrappers
> POP Mail
> POP Mail Security
> QMail side effect speculations and questions
> RPM side effect speculations and questions
> User group/club formation
> Beginner questions
> anything that the sender thinks/feels/surmises/postulates/hopes is qmail
> related
> What is particularly on-topic is anything related to the senders efforts to
> use qmail effectively on their unique, strange, and broken environment that
> may have some effect on qmail and it's derivatives.
> 
> Cross-posting to other lists is allowed with the following caveats: the
> cross-posting should be relevant to the other lists, and any responses
> should have cross-posting removed from those other lists unless the response
> is still relevant. In other words, the new list will be very tolerant of
> cross-postings, i.e., the more the merrier, but participants should actively
> attempt to prune according to the wishes of the other list communities.
> 
> What is forbidden on my new list.
> 
> Any mailing containing the following:
> "Your an idiot"
> "That is off-topic"
> "That is way off-topic"
> "Take it elsewhere"
> "RTFM"
> "Your posting is against the rules of this list"
> 
> or other such messages.
> 
> Subscribers will be on the honor system to follow the rules and will be
> asked to leave by me if they do not.
> 
> I am considering calling it:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> I'd appreciate any suggestions.
> 
> Alex Miller
> 

Reply via email to