On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Russell Nelson wrote:
> You're solving the wrong problem (which means that you'll never
> succeed, except at random). The problem is that Mail.com has no clue.
> If you don't give them a clue, you are failing to do the right thing.
> Tell Mail.com's customers why their mail isn't going through, and let
> *them* LART Mail.com.
Would'nt it make sense to ask the fine people at the MAPSRBL to explain
the meaning of their test? And to point to qmail as an example of an MTA
which will properly bounce back.
