On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 09:31:14AM +0100, Petr Novotny wrote:
>
> have you seen
> http://www.securityportal.com/direct.cgi?/closet/closet19990915.html
>
> Anyone cares to comment?
* qmail is not painful to configure and maintain.
* the qmail license may be unclear in some points, but I can't see why Kurt
is quoting the clearest part of the "license".
DJB:s main point is that you can't distribute binary qmail distributions
or modified source distributions and still claim that it's qmail.
It's a matter of taste. Nothing else.
The most important statement to all administrators and OS distributors out
there is to finally DUMP sendmail.
--
magnus
-- MOST useless 1998 * http://x42.com/
