On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Eric Dahnke wrote: > > Someone will scold me for this post, but would appreciate any thoughts: > > A T1 would be ~ 80% utilized passing 22,000msgs/hr if the average msg > size was 23K. I would not bet on it. The average message size is not an indicator of network traffic. For example, if you pushed two messages over the line, one that's 2 gig and one that's 1 meg, the average would mean very little.
- OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail Eric Dahnke
- Re: OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail Stan Horwitz
- Re: OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail Todd A. Jacobs
- Re: OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail Roger Merchberger
- RE: OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail Lyndon Griffin
- Re: OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail Gordon Smith
- Re: OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail Eric Dahnke
- Re: OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail markd
- Re: OT: saturating a T1 with e-mail Markus Stumpf
- Bandwidth usage, was [OT: saturati... Eric Dahnke
- Re: Bandwidth usage, was [OT: ... Mark Delany