On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 12:21:23AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > the same IP-address, with the consequence, that the reverse-mapping > 1.2.3.4 PTR will point to just one of the n hosts. What's the general > opinion on how "legal" this is? This is perfectly legal. But you can also 4 IN PTR virt1.com. IN PTR virt2.com. IN PTR virt3.com. IN PTR virt4.com. IN PTR virt5.com. This is legal, too. \Maex -- SpaceNet GmbH | http://www.Space.Net/ | Stress is when you wake Research & Development | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | up screaming and you Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0 | realize you haven't D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299 | fallen asleep yet.
- MX question related to diff. A and MX record Einar Bordewich
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record Florian G. Pflug
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record Markus Stumpf
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX re... claudio . nieder
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and M... claudio . nieder
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and M... Russell Nelson
- Re: MX question related to diff. A ... claudio . nieder
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and M... Markus Stumpf
- Re: MX question related to diff. A ... claudio . nieder
- Re: MX question related to diff... Markus Stumpf
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record Einar Bordewich
- Re: MX question related to diff. A and MX record Russell Nelson
- Configuration problem Rohit Khamkar
- RE: Configuration problem Steve Kapinos
- New Config. problem Rohit Khamkar
- Re: New Config. problem Dave Sill