OK, here's an interesting one. Standard Maildir, NFS, a mail sent to 
the user appears instantly in "new" and looks complete and intact 
sitting in the Maildir/new folder - permissions on trigger are in 
order. No delivery problems indicated. Telnet to POP port and it 
fails to retrieve it. They're showing up later than sent even though 
delivery to the server is done on time. Is there an issue perhaps 
with NFS and the QmailPOP daemon? Perhaps unrelated problem, sometime 
messages are transferred successfully to "cur" but not retrieved by 
POP despite correct permissions...

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 29980 invoked from network); 4 Dec 1999 17:36:02 -0000
Received: from renfro.duesouth.net (216.98.0.50)
   by cache-ns.duesouth.net with SMTP; 4 Dec 1999 17:36:02 -0000
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
        by renfro.duesouth.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA17458
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 12:38:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 12:38:04 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Abuse Support Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Duesouth Customer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Abuse Complaint Ticket 120499-020


Customer E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Headers:
-------------------------------

        Received: (qmail 15420 invoked from network); 22 Jun 1999 10:39:37 -0000
        Received: from mail.wespe.de (HELO wespemail.wespe.de) (212.68.64.20)
        by cache-ns.duesouth.net with SMTP; 22 Jun 1999 10:39:37 -0000
        Received: from wespemail.wespe.de ([127.0.0.1]) by wespemail.wespe.de
        (Netscape Messaging Server 3.56) with SMTP id 379;
        Tue, 22 Jun 1999 01:27:15 +0200
        Received: from 216.221.160.28 by wespemail.wespe.de (InterScan 
E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 21
        Jun 1999 23:15:38 +0100
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Reply-To:
        Subject: Accept Credit Cards....and Watch Your Profits SOAR!!! rqlmp
        Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 01:27:15 +0200
        Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Further Details (if any)
----------------------------------------
Slimesuckers

Reply via email to