At 19:06 16/12/99 -0500, Sam wrote:
>Qmail is not always the best solution for everyone, so you have to
>evaluate your individual needs, to see which mailer is a better fit for
>you.
>
>Qmail is faster in some (but not all) situations, plus it demands far less
>in terms of CPU and I/O resources. On the other hand, Qmail supports very
>little beyond basic SMTP. Qmail, without extensive patching, does not
>support authenticated SMTP, does not have any kind of spam filtering, and
>does not use RFC 1894 delivery status notifications.
HOw about othert MTAs like postfix, exim ?
