On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 01:47:22PM -0600, Ronny Haryanto wrote:
> On 01-Feb-2000, Adam McKenna wrote:
> > This is _not_ an IMail problem. This is a user-configurable setting.
> >
> > If mail from <> is bouncing that means the admin of that site has chosen to
> > enable that setting. (It might be the default, but I'm pretty sure it's
> > not.)
>
> But if <> is valid, what is the reason to make this behaviour
> user-configurable in the first place? In other words, when is <> not
> valid?
That's not the point. Giving the user an option to break the RFC is not the
same as breaking the RFC.
--Adam
>
> --
> Ronny Haryanto
>
