Pavel Kankovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The error message is quite long. In fact, it is probably longer than > most email addresses, even with additional "rcpt to:". If you send an > empty message to many bogus recipients (limited only by the amount of > virtual memory available to qmail-remote), you can get > 100% > amplification easily (compared to your own network traffic). 100% amplification isn't particularly interesting. Most of the existing DoS attacks give you an order of magnitude of amplification or more. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Vincent Schonau
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Lorens Kockum
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS James Raftery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Bruno Wolff III
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Bruno Wolff III
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS James Raftery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Russ Allbery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Dirk Harms-Merbitz
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Russ Allbery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Racer X
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Dirk Harms-Merbitz
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Bruno Wolff III
- RE: SMTP in distributed DOS Greg Owen