On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 08:03:04AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 02:53:41PM +0100, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > You're missing a point: the message is sent with a couple of 100 recipients. > > All these recipients will bounce the message - separately. There's your > > amplification :) > > This is a gain if you are sending the original message through a small pipe > to a mail server that has better connectivity and will relay for you. Which is my point :) Greetz, Peter. -- Peter van Dijk - student/sysadmin/ircoper/madly in love/pretending coder | | 'C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; | C++ makes it harder, but when you do it blows your whole leg off.' | Bjarne Stroustrup, Inventor of C++
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Robert Sander
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Brian Johnson
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Adam McKenna
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Steve Sobol
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Omachonu Ogali
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Vincent Schonau
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Lorens Kockum
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS James Raftery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Bruno Wolff III
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Bruno Wolff III
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS James Raftery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS petervd
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Russ Allbery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Dirk Harms-Merbitz
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Russ Allbery
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Racer X
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Dirk Harms-Merbitz
- Re: SMTP in distributed DOS Bruno Wolff III