On 30 May 2000, Russ Allbery wrote:
>John Gonzalez/netMDC admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Qpopper works fine for us, there is also a server-mode directive to
>> change this default behavior to be more like a regular pop server, it
>> will NOT copy the file and cause chunking on the HD.
>
>We use qpopper currently in a high-volume environment, but I definitely
>wouldn't describe it as "fine." We have a bunch of local patches to try
Like i said originally... we use qpopper, and it works fine for us. Your
mileage however, may vary. We are a small shop, and dont have many
customer accounts on this box. It serves our virtual domains well, and on
our busy server where our dialup account mail is stored, we use maildir
and qpop-3d.
There isnt enough traffic to max out the box, and i believe that even a
poorly coded pop3 server should be able to handle a light load =) I'm not
in a position to stress test the box, i have neither the time, nor the
customer base, nor the will or want to do it just for shits and grins...
But, as always, everyones needs are different. It filled a gap when we
first started, and aside from the security flaws that pop up somewhat
regularly, we've been quite happy.
Besides, the price was right =)
--
_ __ _____ __ _________
______________ /_______ ___ ____ /______ John Gonzalez/Net.Tech
__ __ \ __ \ __/_ __ `__ \/ __ /_ ___/ MDC Computers/netMDC!
_ / / / `__/ /_ / / / / / / /_/ / / /__ (505)437-7600/fax-437-3052
/_/ /_/\___/\__/ /_/ /_/ /_/\__,_/ \___/ http://www.netmdc.com
[---------------------------------------------[system info]-----------]
5:55pm up 19 days, 23:21, 4 users, load average: 0.53, 0.48, 0.43
