no I don't "assume" a qmail installation. All of the boxes I Administer
have or will soon have qmail installed. I don't want to track versions
of other tools on a few dozen different boxes.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:44:23AM -0500, William E. Baxter wrote:
> I don't understand. You assume a qmail installation, but adding
> qtools makes it 'special'?
>
> W.
>
> On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 11:34:39PM -0500, Graphic Rezidew wrote:
> > Yes, thank you, this I know. I'm writing this one because I want a solution
> > that I can implement anywhere without the need for other 'special' tools.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 07:18:15PM -0500, William E. Baxter wrote:
> > > qtools includes replier, a tool for creating autoresponders. See
> > >
> > > http://www.superscript.com/qtools/intro.html
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > W.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 04:12:53PM -0500, Graphic Rezidew wrote:
> > > > I'm considering writing an auto-responder in AWK for qmail.
> > > >
> > > > My initial thought is to grab the 'From:' field and use it if there is
> > > > no 'reply-to' field and then call qmail-inject. Does anyone see any
> > > > glaring wholes thus far?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (no, using AWK doesn't count as a whole. It's still a kick arse tool. )
> >
