> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 11 Jul 00, at 14:31, Aaron Nowalk wrote:
> > > 3. Does "relays.radparker.com" really live? To me it seems it's 
> > > dead.
> > I can ping it and I've tried changing the hostname to
> > maps.vix.com in the tcpserver rc script.  
> 
> Well yes, it pings, but does it serve out any meaningful 
> information? (Let me remind you that "no record" means "host is 
> OK"; it the zone is empty, no machine will be considered spam-
> source.)

Heres what I get when I try it without any options from the command line:

root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops
rblsmtpd: pid 6387: 451 Blackholed - see
<URL:http://mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/lookup?127.0.0.2>
220 rblsmtpd.local
quit
221 rblsmtpd.local

So that appears to work.  Now, heres with the -r option:

root@xxxxxx:/usr/local/bin# env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r
maps.vix.com echo whoops
whoops

So with the -r option, it looks like it goes through.  I tried removing
the -r option from my tcpserver startup script and it doesn't seem to
help.  Still getting Nelsons friendly "UH OH!  Your RBL blocker isn't
working!!!"  

> 
> > > You may test your rblsmtpd like this:
> > > env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd -r relays.radparker.com 
> > > echo hello
> > > (all on one line) and see what happens. You may also test with
> > > different IPs.
> > 
> > I tried and I always get "hello."  I'm really stumped!  
> 
> What if you try without the -r parameter?
> env TCPREMOTEIP=127.0.0.2 rblsmtpd echo whoops
> 
> It doesn't get through on my comp.
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.0.2 -- QDPGP 2.60 
> Comment: http://community.wow.net/grt/qdpgp.html
> 
> iQA/AwUBOWtccVMwP8g7qbw/EQIOswCeJt4iatiKpxNdzxHKsMl7r1VQLMcAn2tL
> uLOFdORnR/dNfuJCES3/Re/9
> =5OoL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.antek.cz
> PGP key ID: 0x3BA9BC3F
> -- Don't you know there ain't no devil there's just God when he's drunk.
>                                                              [Tom Waits]
> 

Reply via email to