Is UTIME necessary in a mail queue? If a logging filesystem were mounted on a separate disk (or network array, etc.) specifically for the mail queue, shouldn't it be mounted without UTIME? Bruce Guenter wrote: > The only way to get truely zero seek performance is to use a > log-structured file system on a clean disk. Otherwise, you will seek > occasionally to write out some dirty metadata. Even if you pre-allocate > your log file on a regular filesystem, you will seek occasionally (once > a second, AFAICT) to update the utime in the inode.
- RE: questions about performance and setup Austad, Jay
- Re: questions about performance and setup markd
- Re: questions about performance and setup John White
- Re: questions about performance and setup Jason Haar
- Re: questions about performance and setup Steve Wolfe
- Re: questions about performance and setup Bruce Guenter
- Re: questions about performance and setup Bruce Guenter
- Re: questions about performance and se... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: questions about performance a... Bruce Guenter
- Re: questions about performan... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: questions about performance a... markd
- Re: questions about performan... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: questions about performance and setup Oliver White
- RE: questions about performance and setup Austad, Jay
- RE: questions about performance and setup Austad, Jay
- Re: questions about performance and setup Michael T. Babcock
- RE: questions about performance and setup Austad, Jay