It's too bad that the article was somewhat accurate. Although I cannot say
that I have experienced the same kind of treatment, I have seen it, and it
is deplorable. I don't pretend I am an expert on qmail, but I have been
successful with several installations of it. Maybe I've been lucky.
For those of you reading this that have been a party to this undesirable
beahavior, ask yourself this question:
Were you born with all the knowledge you now posess? Have you studied the
source code to every program you use to determine it's use and function? Or
did someone, somewhere, somehow, answer a question or two for you? Have you
ever read a FAQ, a doc, or (gasp) the replies on a mailing list?
Maybe you're not the genius you thought you were.
My 2 cents only.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Humorous
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 01:16:14PM -0500, dG wrote:
> > For all fans of linuxpeople, this is the latest news on his website,
> > www.linuxpeople.cc.
> >
> > September 14th, qmail: WHAT @ FSCKING JOKE!
> > Brought to you from the "Do not even waste your time department"
>
> I'm famous! From http://www.linuxpeople.cc/qmail.htm:
>
> "Even Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> author of 'The
> qmail newbie's
> guide to relaying' acted like a complete jerk."
>
> Chris
>
