[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
SNIP
>
> > > and also tell us which IP address you are sending from.
> >
> > 63.105.9.34
>
> Ahhh. Perfect.
>
> >
> > > They are running postfix and it does not like either: the results of a dns query
>on your forward/reverse or of the sender address or perhaps part of what
> > > you're sending in the helo.
> >
SNIP
Just to confirm -- Mark has probably hit the nail on the head with this
one:
root@frodo:~# dig -x 63.105.9.34
; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> -x
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 4
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; 34.9.105.63.in-addr.arpa, type = ANY, class = IN
IMHO, any competent DNS admin should _never_, _ever_ permit _any_
address he is responsible for to be answered NXDOMAIN for a PTR record.
This is just unacceptably sloppy DNS admin. Lots of DNS admins do it,
but then again lots of DNS admins run and like M$ DNS or BIND ;).
Grrrrrr. Incompetent DNS administration at this level really yanks my
chain...
GW
