* Bruno Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 05:33:34PM -0400, Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No. Reply-to-Recipient is necessary and sufficient. > And what if the sender isn't on the list? Then the sender should ask for a Cc: - remember kids, it isn't called Courtesy Copy for nothing. Sending a Cc: to someone obviously subscribed to a list is the exact opposite of courtesy (and a straight way into many killfiles including mine, courtesy of procmail). As I said before: if you think you need to use Outlook or similarly defective "programs" use them for what they were made for: reading mail. Not writing. -- Robin S. Socha <http://socha.net/>
- Re: qmail list reply-to Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail list reply-to Robin S. Socha
- Re: qmail list reply-to Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail list reply-to Neil Blakey-Milner
- Re: qmail list reply-to Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail list reply-to Charles McLagan
- Re: qmail list reply-to Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail list reply-to Bruno Wolff III
- Re: qmail list reply-to Charles McLagan
- Re: qmail list reply-to Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail list reply-to Robin S. Socha
- Re: qmail list reply-to Neil Blakey-Milner
- RE: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Chris Garrigues
- Re: qmail list reply-to Kris Kelley
- Re: qmail list reply-to Jason Brooke
- Re: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Jason Brooke
- Re: qmail list reply-to Brett Randall
- Re: qmail list reply-to Charles McLagan
- Re: qmail list reply-to Vince Vielhaber
