----- Original Message -----
From: "Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: qmail list reply-to


> * Bruno Wolff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 05:33:34PM -0400,   Russell Nelson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> No.  Reply-to-Recipient is necessary and sufficient.
> > And what if the sender isn't on the list?
>
> Then the sender should ask for a Cc: - remember kids, it isn't called
> Courtesy Copy for nothing. Sending a Cc: to someone obviously subscribed
> to a list is the exact opposite of courtesy (and a straight way into
> many killfiles including mine, courtesy of procmail). As I said before:
> if you think you need to use Outlook or similarly defective "programs"
> use them for what they were made for: reading mail. Not writing.
> --

This is a waste of time.  I'll figure it out on my own.  If I want religion
I'll
go to church.


Reply via email to