Hi,
yes, that was one reason, but now postmaster gets a return mail:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unrouteable mail domain "otherdomain.com"
The log looks fine.... (?)
Oct 22 15:56:21 lix qmail: 972222981.883461 info msg 201365: bytes 1105
from qp 2254 uid 1065
Oct 22 15:56:21 lix qmail: 972222981.943648 starting delivery 2819: msg
201365 to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 22 15:56:21 lix qmail: 972222981.943719 status: local 1/10 remote 1/20
Oct 22 15:56:21 lix qmail: 972222981.943746 delivery 2818: success:
did_1+1+0/qp_2254/
Oct 22 15:56:21 lix qmail: 972222981.943771 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20
Oct 22 15:56:21 lix qmail: 972222981.943794 end msg 201364
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.055835 delivery 2819: success:
193.12.6.233_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK_id=13nLaw-0003X7-00/
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.055931 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
The mail seams delivered but the postmaster gets this:
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.055955 end msg 201365
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.284839 new msg 201364
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.284930 info msg 201364: bytes 2383
from <> qp 2257 uid 502
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.331165 starting delivery 2820: msg
201364 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.331236 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.357498 delivery 2820: success:
did_1+0+0/ Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.357578 status: local 0/10
remote 0/20
Oct 22 15:56:22 lix qmail: 972222982.357602 end msg 201364
Any ideas?
TIA
/Richard
At 15:34 2000-10-22 +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Richard Sjögårdh wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Oct 22 15:13:06 lix qmail: 972220386.456634 delivery 2793: deferral:
> > Uh-oh:_.qmail_has_file_delivery_but_has_x_bit_set._(#4.7.0)/
> > How do I fix this?
>
>chmod -x .qmail is my wild guess?
>
>-Johan
>--
>Johan Almqvist
