hi,
IMHO chmod should do the trick...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2000 5:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: very slow delivery
>
>
> Hi
>
> I am having the same problem, where it takes 20 minutes for mail to
> be delivered, whether it's remote to local, local to remote, or local
> to local.
>
> It seems that indeed the permissions on the trigger file are
> wrong, mine is:
>
> prw-------  1 qmails  qmail  0 Oct 23 02:27 /var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger
>
> Now, it has been taking 20 minutes to delever ever since I installed
> it. So presumably my installation didn't work properly, or has bugs
> in it. I'm using the FreeBSD ports collection to install qmail.
>
> I am confused about Magnus's suggestion on how to fix it, ie do a
> "make setup" from the qmail source. Would it not be enough to
> manually fix the permissions with chmod?
>
> If I cd to /usr/ports/mail/qmail and do "make setup" it response with
> "don't know how to make setup".
>
> Cheers
>
> Jesse
>
> PS, this would be an excellent thing to have in the FAQ! It seems
> many people are having this problem.
>
> >
> >On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 05:09:47PM +0200, Mirko Koenig wrote:
> >
> >  > now the delivery and sending of messages takes 20 min.
> >  > i write a message eg. in pine send it and then have to wait
> up to 20 min
> >  > till its delivered.
> >
> >check the permissions of "/var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger"
> >
> ># ls -l /var/qmail/queue/lock/
> >total 1
> >-rw-------   1 qmails   qmail           0 Mar  2  1999 sendmutex
> >-rw-r--r--   1 qmailr   qmail        1024 Jul  1 19:58 tcpto
> >prw--w--w-   1 qmails   qmail           0 Jul  1 20:58 trigger
> >^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >If it doesn't is "prw--w--w-", then do a "make setup" from the
> qmail source
> >library again.
> >
> >/magnus
> >
> >--
> >http://x42.com/
> >
> >
> --
>
> --
>        Jesse Reynolds - Virtual Artists Pty Ltd - http://www.va.com.au
>              Email: jesse (at) va.com.au        - http://virtual.artists
>
>

Reply via email to