On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 01:58:48PM -0600, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 10 November 2000 at 16:31:26 -0500
> > Eric Wang writes:
> > > > > Do I still need the Oversize DNS Patch?
> > > > No.
> > > why don't need anymore?
> >
> > Because AOL realized their mistake. Not even AOL can get away with
> > DNS replies larger than 512 bytes.
>
> They've flopped back and forth a few times, though. And while they
> seem to be okay at the moment, I wouldn't consider this closed. I
> want to keep the oversize DNS patch in my system.
Also, AOL isn't the only one who has been doing this, there have been a few
other places I've had this problem with, on-and-off.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "No matter how much it changes,
http://flounder.net/publickey.html | technology's just a bunch of wires
GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA | connected to a bunch of other wires."
38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A | Joe Rogan, _NewsRadio_
3:03pm up 156 days, 13:19, 10 users, load average: 0.09, 0.05, 0.01
