Paul Jarc wrote: > > Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So has any expert ever audited qmail or djbdns? > > I imagine Dan has, and many would consider him an expert, but one is > rarely the best auditor of one's own work. I, as the author of the qmail-ldap patch, have looked deeply into the guts of qmail and found it to be secure. If one actually reads the source and see's the way Dan writes software he would find that qmail is secure. The only possible holes are OS bugs or issues. -- Andre
- Re: secrets and lies Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Mate Wierdl
- Re: secrets and lies Ryan Russell
- Re: secrets and lies Paul Jarc
- Re: secrets and lies Ryan Russell
- Re: secrets and lies Felix von Leitner
- Re: secrets and lies Mate Wierdl
- Re: secrets and lies Felix von Leitner
- Re: secrets and... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: secrets and lies Andre Oppermann
- Re: secrets and lies Andre Oppermann
- Re: secrets and lies Mate Wierdl
- Re: secrets and lies Peter van Dijk
- Re: secrets and lies Mate Wierdl
- Re: secrets and lies Andre Oppermann
- Re: secrets and lies Russ Allbery
- Re: secrets and lies Mate Wierdl
- RE: secrets and lies Lipscomb, Al
- RE: secrets and lies David Dyer-Bennet
- RE: secrets and lies Lipscomb, Al