Greg White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 24 November 2000 at 23:11:06 -0800
> Paul Jarc wrote:
> > Dan's software isn't open source.
> Oh, really? By whose definition? I have the source, and I have the
> actual program. I suppose if you're some ESR/RMS fanatic, this does
> not comply with your vision of "open source". The source is
> available, and by Dan's own words you can do what you like with
> it. As far as I am concerned, this meets anyone's definition of
> "open source" except a fanatic.
Might I suggest that you limit yourself to expressing your own
opinion? This "all reasonable people agree with me" assertion is
unsupported, and I suspect overly broad.
--
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
