Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2000 22:04 schrieb Thomas Duterme: > > How about increasing your concurrencyremote to something > > like 100? you most likely are hitting your limits. > > Good point. Will try that tonight. I've gotten some > problems before from ISP's blocking us > when I went up to 240...I'm not quite sure what the highest > polite limit on this should be. Hmm, even with 20 concurrent connections our servers was blocked by some braindead freemailer's servers when one of our customers sent out a newsletter... I don't think there is a common "highest polite limit", you have to figure it out for your country, even for your typical recipients. Greetings Henning -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg www.bsws.de | Germany
- Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Thomas Duterme
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Sean Reifschneider
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Jenny Holmberg
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings asantos
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Thomas Duterme
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Thomas Duterme
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Henning Brauer
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Wayne Chu
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mail... Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dyn... Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dyn... Wayne Chu
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Jenny Holmberg
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale... Ken Jones