Re: Secondary MX (Was: Mail flood in queue)

[Mark Delany]

> | (As an aside. This re-raises the question of whether it is good
> | practise to be a secondary MX for another site. I generally think it's
> | a bad idea...)
> 
> At least if you do, it's very helpful if the two sites have identical
> policies with regards to such things as relaying, checking envelope
> sender domains and the like.

That's good advice. Also make sure that you have identical (or
sufficient) resources.


Regards.